logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.12.24 2020누52643
과징금부과처분취소 청구의 소
Text

All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the court of first instance 4 to 14 from the date below No. 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and Article

1) Article 98(1)1 of the National Health Insurance Act provides that “Where a medical care institution has charged costs of health care by fraud or other improper means, it does not require the medical care institution to submit false data or actively conceal facts in order to receive costs of health care (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Du3975, Jul. 10, 2008).” (2) The National Health Insurance Act was enacted to contribute to improving public health and promoting social security by providing insurance benefits for the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of diseases and injuries, for childbirth, death, and improvement of health (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Du3975, Jul. 10, 2008).”

arrow