1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the Cheongyang-gun C's Ma', and Defendant B is a person who operates the Ma's Ma's Ma'.

As above, while engaging in the mass industry, the Defendants subscribed to the victims G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) and the livestock disaster insurance against the meat raised by the Defendants. The livestock disaster insurance is an insurance to compensate for the damage of livestock farmers caused by the death of livestock, such as chickens, cattle, and pigs, by using livestock as an insurance object. The term “livestock disaster insurance” refers to an insurance to compensate for the damage of livestock, etc. in the ordinary terms and conditions of the livestock disaster insurance, where livestock have been discarded for a direct reason, or where livestock have been destroyed due to a fire, wind, flood, flood, snow damage, snow damage, or fire, flood damage under the general terms and conditions of the livestock disaster insurance (special terms and conditions on the guarantee of risk of electrical apparatus), female land, changeers, voltage, voltage, voltage, electric power generation, lightning, power distribution team, and other similar electric equipment or facilities, thereby causing damage to livestock, etc. due to changes in temperature.

The Defendants, even though they died of or died from the above insurance due to a crub disease, were killed due to the malfunction of a brub or electrical device, they stored the crub in the farm because of a disguised disease, etc. that could not be known after the crub died due to the malfunction of the crub or electrical device, and had the crub in order to acquire the above insurance money by claiming the insurance money from the victim company by pretending that the crub was dead due to an insured event that

1. On April 14, 2015, Defendant A entered into a contract with H on the condition that the contract is extended by one year from around April 14, 2015, and raised 123,740 mar from “D” in the Defendant’s operation upon entrustment of 133,100 marri from May 18, 2017, and shipped 123,740 mar from around June 20, 2017. Defendant A was entrusted with the consignment of 124,90 marri around July 1, 2017.