logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.20 2017고단2399
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D who was divingd at the victim D in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, about May 10, 2017, at “Eel, under the influence of alcohol and at the entrance of the room; and (b) why the victim was “?”

B. The phrase “A” means, “Is this house inside, and whose report Is this house?”

The term "the victim's market price at the entrance of the telecom" was cut up and damaged by breaking the fire that could not be known at the market price.

2. At the same place as before around 03:00 on May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was requested by G to present an identification card from the police officer belonging to the F District of the Daejeon East Police Station, the Daejeon East Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the said D’s 112 report; and (b) was assigned to him/her, “this erogen, embs, and one set.”

As G, while taking a bath, she avoided this, it was assaulted by G, such as ginging the string of the string to the right shoulder of G, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties in regard to the handling of reported cases, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Investigation report (investigation, etc. of the suspect's condition and behavior at the time);

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is that the defendant does not completely deny and entirely reflect the crime of this case; that there are many criminal records related to violence (suspension of execution, suspension of execution, and fines) including the crime of destroying property, which is the same kind of crime; and that the defendant's assaulting the police to perform legitimate official duties by putting in uniform has interfered with the legitimate exercise of public authority that should be strictly executed; thus, the form of the crime and the nature of the crime are not good.

arrow