Text
[Defendant A] Suspension of sentence for the defendant
[Defendant B] Defendant is innocent
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, around 19:55 on May 26, 2018, while driving a Frocketing motor vehicle on the 1st line of the 1st line of the king-gu E (Wang 2nd line) in front of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.
G Spo-type car interfered with traffic by stopping on the road between about 10 minutes on the ground that the car did not turn on the way first.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;
1. On-site photographs, the 112 Report Processing List, and investigation reports (the statement of the reporter on telephone communications);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of suspect A’s black images);
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 185 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;
1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Considering the favorable circumstances, such as: (a) the confession of the Defendant after the issuance of a summary order on the grounds of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence; (b) the time during which traffic obstruction occurred is ten minutes; and (c) the concession has already been made to two vehicles prior to entering a narrow road where traffic is difficult; and (d) the fact that there was no criminal history for the Defendant; and (c) the first, namely, there was no criminal history for the Defendant; and (d) the first being classified as the subject of the judgment.
In addition, the sentence shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various sentencing conditions in Article 51 of the Criminal Act as shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentence shall be suspended.
The acquittal portion
1. On May 26, 2018, Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant”) driven a passenger car on the road of the first line (Seoul-do 2 tea line) located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on May 26, 2018, while driving a passenger car on May 26, 2018.
FLstren car interfered with the traffic by stopping on the road between about 10 minutes on the ground that the car did not turn on the way first.
2.