beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 27, 2014, the Defendant prepared a false complaint against B with the aim of having B receive criminal punishment from the public service center of the Suwon Police Station, which is located in 2460, according to the punishment of the Suwon-si, Daegu-si.
On March 27, 2014, at the time of the investigation conducted by the Labor Office located in Daegu Simdong at 3 p.m. on March 27, 2014, B intimidationd the complainant by stating that “I will punish B, because B was “I will punish B, because B would be a fluor, fluort, fluort, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor, fluor.”
However, in fact B did not inform the defendant of the above that he had threatened him.
Nevertheless, on March 27, 2014, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to the police officer whose name cannot be known at the public service center of the Suwon Police Station. On March 28, 2014, the Defendant made a statement to the same purport and made a statement to the same effect.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning D and E;
1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B;
1. Statement of the police statement of the defendant;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's complaint;
1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a crime that seriously infringes on the national legal interest, which is a proper exercise of the state's functions of adjudication due to a defendant's crime, and seriously threatens the legal stability of the crime.
The defendant has the same kind of power and has been sentenced to imprisonment for 6 months with the same kind of power, and the circumstances are not good.
However, the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and divided the wrong facts, and the person who was in charge and the person who was in charge.