1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 40,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from April 13, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into an investment contract (hereinafter “instant investment contract”) with the Defendant Company (the representative director of the Defendant Company was C at the time of the Plaintiff’s investment, but D, the actual president, entered into a contract with the Plaintiff with the representative director C) with the following terms that “if the Plaintiff invests money in the Defendant Company, the Defendant Company shall pay the investment principal and its profits 20 days later (hereinafter “the Defendant Company”) and paid the Defendant Company the total amount of KRW 60 million with the said investment amount.

1) Primary investment: Date of contract ( February 12, 2013), investment amount (10 million won), target profit rate (10 million won), target profit rate (10%) 2: date of contract (2.14, 2013), investment amount (10 million won), target profit rate (10%) 3: date of contract (26, 2013.26, February 26, 2013. 4: date of contract (10 million won), investment amount (10 million won), target profit rate (10 million won), target profit rate (100,000 won): 10,000 won (2.28, 100, 100 million won), target profit rate (105%) 5 (105) contract (203,000,000 won), 203,1361,600,000 won (13.636,000,000 won): 4,000 won

B. On February 26, 2013, according to the instant investment contract, the Defendant Company paid to the Plaintiff the principal of the instant primary investment and the amount of KRW 11 million, and KRW 11,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of the principal of the instant secondary investment, but did not pay the principal of the instant secondary investment and the amount of profit.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 11, Eul evidence 1 (including a provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant company did not pay the principal of the third or sixth investment under the investment contract of this case and did not pay the principal of the third or sixth investment and the profits therefrom, and on this ground, it is evident that the copy of the complaint of this case in which the plaintiff expressed his intention to cancel the third or sixth investment contract of this case was served on the defendant company on April 12, 2014, and therefore, it is evident that the copy of the complaint of this case was served on