1. The defendant, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased B, 31,218,969 won and 30,489 out of them.

1. In addition to the whole purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including the serial number) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the representative Eul, on May 16, 2012, with the guarantee period of KRW 30,00,000 for general loan to the new bank B, from May 16, 2012 to May 15, 2013, the guarantee period of KRW 100 was set at 20% of the loan, and the credit guarantee certificate was issued by Eul was 30,00,000 from the new bank as collateral, and the credit guarantee rate of KRW 20,00 was 20,000 from the date following the date of the above credit guarantee certificate was 10,000 to the date of 20,0000,0000 won were 20,000 won were 30,57,000 won were recovered from the new bank as collateral, and the plaintiff collected the principal and 30,716,714.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay 31,218,969 won (i.e., KRW 30,489,421 won) and 30,489,421 won among them, within the scope of the property inherited from the network B, 12% per annum from February 18, 2013 to January 31, 2016, and 10% per annum from the next day to June 21, 2018, the delivery date of the application for alteration of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim as of June 25, 2018, and 10% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment, which is 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.