logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.17 2014가합8459
공제급여금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A was enrolled in E High School located in Ansandong-si at the time of 2010, and the remaining Plaintiffs are their parents or siblings.

Pursuant to Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents at School, the defendant is a corporation established by the Superintendent of an Office of Education to compensate for students, etc. who have suffered damage to their lives or bodies due to school safety accidents.

나. 원고 A은 2011. 8. 9. 영남대학교병원에서 우안(右眼) 망막박리 진단을 받은 뒤 2011. 8. 23. 우안 유리체절제술, 안구 내 레이저치료술, 실리콘기름 주입술, 공막돌륭술을, 2013. 2. 19. 우안 실리콘기름제거술을 각 시술 받았지만, 2013. 7. 4. 시력검사 결과 우안 0.08, 좌안 1.0으로 측정되었고 2015. 3. 13.에는 우안 최대 교정시력이 0.025로 측정되었다.

C. On August 18, 2011, the head of the Ehigh School notified the Defendant of the accident that “the Plaintiff A was subject to school safety accidents on June 23, 2010,” but the Defendant returned the above accident notification on October 5, 201 on the ground that it is impossible to prove causation.

Plaintiff

On October 30, 2013, Plaintiff C, a legal representative of A, claimed disability benefits of KRW 108,376,100 on the part of the Defendant on the ground that “Plaintiff C, who was in charge of the A, was injured while he was engaged in the middle-school hedging in the middle-school playground during the sports hours on June 23, 2010, the F, who was in charge of the A, was mistakenly engaged in the middle-school hedging while he was able to do so, and caused an injury that would have been friendly.” However, on November 19, 2013, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits of KRW 108,376,100. However, there is no evidence proving that the Plaintiff A was injured during the sports hours and caused a school safety accident.

E. On December 27, 2013, Plaintiff C dissatisfied with the foregoing return decision and sought a decision to grant “the payment of disability benefit of KRW 121,535,700” to the Standing Committee on the Compensation for Safety and Aid for School of the Disabledbuk-do, and filed a request for examination. However, on March 20, 2014, Plaintiff C’s assertion that there is no causation between Plaintiff C’s accident on June 23, 2010 and Plaintiff’s injury.”

arrow