The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The punishment (ten months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection in addition) of the first instance court of the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable;

2. The business of a speculative game room, such as the instant crime, requires a very strict punishment of social harm, such as encouraging the public’s spirit of gambling and undermining the will to work.

Although the defendant had been punished for the same crime, he also committed the crime of this case.

If a criminal is instigated a criminal escape on the ground of the so-called branch's branch in order to conceal his/her crime, the crime is not very good because he/she commits the same crime again in the same place even after being under the control.

There is no special change in circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the judgment of the first instance.

In full view of the period and method of crime, size, profits earned by the defendant by committing the crime, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, character and conduct, environment and circumstances after committing the crime, the first instance sentence is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit