The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (an offence No. 1 in the original judgment: a fine of one million won, and a crime No. 2 in the original judgment: a fine of two million won) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment is not only a majority of the criminal records of the same kind of violent crime committed against the defendant, but also on January 8, 2014 and March 26, 2014, the crime is not good because the defendant committed the second crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below on March 30, 2014, which committed the second crime on June 19, 2014, in which the defendant committed the crime of the same kind of violent crime and committed the second crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below on March 30, 2014.

On the other hand, however, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, the defendant deposited 20,000 won to the victim B as compensation for damages, and his father does not want to punish the defendant (the defendant did not want to be punished against the defendant) and the victim C does not want to be punished against the defendant, and the victim B's assault against the victim B is in a relation between the final judgment and the latter concurrent crimes of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. At the same time, it is necessary to consider equity with the case where the judgment is pronounced. The defendant is currently suffering alcohol dependence, and is in a rehabilitation intent to treat the defendant, but there is no other person to support the above child if the defendant is detained, and it seems that there is no other person to support the above child if the defendant is detained. In full view of the circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc., the prosecutor's assertion as above is without merit, and thus it is not reasonable for the court below's sentencing.

(4) However, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant is subject to a suspended sentence due to the reasons such as supporting two children by negligence in the final and conclusive judgment of the court below.