1. The Defendant’s patent right listed in the attached list is based on the Plaintiff’s succession to the right on November 23, 2016.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the arguments, the Defendant filed for registration as D E (hereinafter “instant patent”). The instant patent invention is an invention related to F, which constitutes an employee’s invention under the technical nature of F, and the Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to succeed to the right to the instant patent through the delivery of a copy of the written complaint pursuant to Article 4(1) of the Patent Act.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for patent transfer registration on the instant patent right to the Plaintiff on November 23, 2016 on the ground that the patent right was succeeded by November 23, 2016.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.