logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고단6166
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 12:00 on July 19, 201, the injured Defendant listened to the fourth floor Korean-style life-long office in Seoul, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, about 166, the fourth floor of Korean-style life-long office, the Defendant’s internal combustion-related relationship C, with the victim D, and she was in harmony with the victim while she was in dispute with the victim, and she was in a face of the victim with the face of the victim, she was in the face of the victim for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act is a person who works as an insurance solicitor in the hanok life, and is entitled to access integrated customer information in which the personal information of the customers of the hanok has been recorded to inquire about such information.

Around August 13, 2013, the Defendant called the victim E, who is the husband of the above D, and made a written consent to the collection and use of personal information in the name of D in order to inform the victim E, who is the husband of the above D, as if he were in an internal relationship with C. After inquiring about the integrated customer information in the name of D, then inquiring about the victim’s mobile phone number, who is the husband of D, and acquired it. On December 24, 2013, the Defendant entered the victim’s phone number acquired as above into the mobile phone of C, and leaked another person’s personal

3. Around July 19, 2011, the Defendant publicly announced the victim as “Ig, this two-years, Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Man Ma

However, the victims did not have the rights of the above C and the private rights.

As a result, the Defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on consolidated customer information inquiry;

1. Article 71 subparagraph 6 of the Personal Information Protection Act (Act No. 71 and subparagraph 3 of Article 59), Article 257 (1) and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, and each imprisonment with prison labor;

arrow