All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, ten months of imprisonment, and three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendants showed the attitude of recognizing and opposing the defendants' mistake, the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendants. However, considering the fact that the defendants distributed high-priced stolen vehicles on a systematic basis in light of the degree of their participation in the crime, the method of the crime, the amount of damage, etc., and the fact that it seems difficult to recover material damage in light of all the circumstances taken out overseas, there is no change of circumstances that make it difficult to reduce the punishment of the court below in the trial, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the theory of records and changes, such as the defendants' age, sex, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not unfair because it is excessively unreasonable.

The defendants' argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.