logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고단4344
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a Broding car with alcohol content of 0.180% in alcohol on the blood while under the influence of alcohol at 0.180% prior to the road, “from the front day of the backshore in the southyang-si, the early day of the backshore in the southyang-si, the early day of the backshore in the southyang-si, the early day of the backshore in the south-do.”

2. The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of the above withstanding car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving).

Defendant 1 driven the said grodial car under the influence of alcohol as above at the time of the above day, and driven the road of “D cafeteria” located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the front side of the “D cafeteria,” along the “the distance from the point of departure from the point of “the distance from the bank” to the “the distance from the bank.”

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow domin line is installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the vehicle in advance by ensuring that the driver of the vehicle is engaged in driving the vehicle through thorough operation of the front line and by accurately operating the brake and steering gear while keeping the wheel line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and due to the negligence of driving a central line while driving the motor vehicle, which led to the driving of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle for the defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (25) who was on board the frighting car due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt and tensions in need of a two-day medical treatment, and injury to the victim E, such as salt and tensions in need of a two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Four copies of the on-site photographs;

1. Each written diagnosis;

arrow