logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.02.06 2013고정1177
자동차관리법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who owns a B LA car.

On March 22, 2013, the Defendant voluntarily changed the structure and devices of the motor vehicle by putting the EL lamps on the front side of the vehicle in the front of the strike without obtaining approval from the head of the competent Gu on March 14:15.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Results of inquiry to the Korea Transportation Safety Authority of this court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notice of detection of violation of statutes;

1. Article 81 subparagraph 19 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 81 and Article 34 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, and selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (amount converted per day: 50,000 won);

1. The non-guilty portion of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Sentence)

1. Around March 22, 2013, the Defendant voluntarily changed the structure and devices of the vehicle by putting a ED lamps on the front of the C-turn and a ED lamps on the front of the C-V car, without obtaining approval from the head of the competent Gu on March 14:15, 2013.

2. In light of the results of fact-finding on the issue of whether the installation of the judgment light light is subject to approval for alteration of the structure and device of a motor vehicle, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the replacement of the judgment light light light, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, since the above part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, it should be pronounced not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, as long as it is found to be guilty of violating the Automobile Management Act concerning the replacement of the inside, etc. and the rear, it shall not be sentenced not to

arrow