A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a staff member of a home company “B”.

On September 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid a house in front of the Manan-gu Seoul apartment house 108 Dong guard room in Ansan-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, on the ground that the victim D, the security guard of which was a security guard, was able to get a house in front of the guard room without permission, and (b) made the victim’s bath theory that “this fease gu,” “the victim,” was feasible, flading the victim’s feth, 3 meters, and flading the victim’s feth and 3 meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures [the scope of recommendations according to sentencing guidelines] - No basic area (two months to ten months) of types 1 of assault crimes (general assault) - No person subject to special sentencing: [Determination of sentence] - The defendant's mistake is recognized for favorable circumstances: The defendant's mistake is disadvantageous circumstances: The defendant has a history of being punished for the same kind of crime as he/she has been punished for the crime of assault and injury by assault against apartment security guards in relation to the delivery of selective distribution in 2015, and did not agree with the victim.