The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal recognized that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim by sculping the victim E- bat and drinking the victim’s arms and chest, etc., but the Defendant was not guilty of the facts charged of this case. In addition, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is with the victim E, who is not adequate to make a usual appraisal in the D apartment 1207-dong parking lot around October 26, 2012, around 09:30, Namyang-si, Yangyang-si.

The breath of the victim was shaking, and the breath of the victim's arms, chests, etc. was taken once again, and the victim got about two weeks of treatment.

B. The lower court, based on the main evidence that the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (hereinafter “E”) as indicated in the facts charged, submitted a specific complaint to the police officer of E and witness E and the court of the lower court, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated at the court of the lower court, namely, E, the police officer on December 3, 2012, stating that “E was subject to violence from the Defendant and received two-way diagnosis from the hospital immediately after receiving treatment,” and that on October 28, 2012, the date of the instant crime was examined by the police on December 6, 2012, and stated that “The date of the instant crime was 20 days before the closure of the injury diagnosis certificate” to the effect that “The date of the instant crime was 10 days before the police officer’s statement to the effect that it was 20 days before the date of the instant crime,” and thus, the instant case was not inconsistent with each other’s statement to the effect that “The date of the instant crime was 10 days after 20 days before the instant police.