All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal 1) The punishment of the defendant (two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 1 in its holding, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 2 and No. 3 in its holding) is too unreasonable.

2) The Prosecutor’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The lower court rendered a two-month imprisonment and six-month imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes No. 1 as indicated in the lower judgment and No. 2 and No. 3 as indicated in the lower judgment, taking into account the favorable circumstances and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant.

When comprehensively considering the conditions for sentencing in the trial, the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion, and the sentencing guidelines, the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion.

There is no circumstance that it is unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances, and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too hot or unfasible.

Therefore, the argument that the sentencing of the defendant and the prosecutor is unfair is without merit.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.