1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 10, 2019 to April 23, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 1, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the commission of executive officers (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the following content.

Article 2 (Term of Contract)

1. This Agreement shall be based on one year and, if there is a mutual objection, shall be mutually agreed to decide whether to continue the contract even prior to the expiration of the contract period.

2. The termination of the contract term shall be notified 15 days before the expiration of the contract term, and if no notification of the termination of the contract is made, the contract shall continue pursuant to the above paragraph 1.

Article 3 (Remuneration) Wages shall be KRW 72,00,000 ( KRW 72,00,000) for annual salary, and the standards for payment, etc. shall be as prescribed by the rules of employment and the separate annual salary contract of the company.

Article 4 (Remuneration) A company shall pay 1/12 of the annual salary, which has been applied to the retirement formula, as remuneration for retirement for one year or more, in cases where the period of appointment and dismissal of an executive is at least one year.

B. After consultation with the Plaintiff on March 21, 2018, the Defendant sent the following e-mail to the Plaintiff on March 22, 2018, stating that “the notice of termination of an officer appointment contract” was sent to the Plaintiff. On March 23, 2018, the Defendant announced that the Plaintiff was assigned to the Plaintiff on the bulletin board of the company.

A Director has been able to have been dnickly.

It is known that the appointment contract of the director is terminated on March 30, 2018.

From April 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018, the contract that was concluded with the representative state was the same as the previous contract, but the duty content and the right to approve was again determined to conclude the contract.

If the representative National Assembly intends to conclude a contract as the content, etc. of the work, it shall be understood that the contract will be entered into.

C. On March 30, 2018, the Plaintiff divided the following dialogues between Defendant representative director and C.

The plaintiff: It is the same at least 12 times to transmit the case due to the date of the today's house.

In relation to the work for the next three months, I will look at this separately.

approximately one year and five months of service in B.