The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (seven years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. That the fact that the Defendant’s mistake reflects the Defendant’s mistake is a circumstance that can be considered as favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant to threaten the mixed women from the road to the knives of the industrial knife, cut off the bags containing cash and identification cards, etc. in the course of committing the crime of this case, and the defendant inflicted an injury on the knife of the knife in the course of committing the crime is very dangerous and poor.

In particular, the Defendant prepared to commit the crime by wearing the cryping shields immediately before committing the crime, and tried to destroy evidence by burning the cryp of the victim who was demoted after committing the crime.

After having been sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment for murder, etc., the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime.

The punishment sentenced by the court below is the only punishment among the statutory penalty for the instant crime, which is limited to minor imprisonment, and is limited to repeated crime under Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment of Specific Crimes, and then constitutes the lowest punishment among the scope of punishment which has undergone discretionary mitigation.

In full view of all the circumstances, including these circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment appears to be an appropriate sentence corresponding to its liability, and it is not determined that the sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.