The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below and the judgment of the court of first instance as to the first ground for appeal, the first instance court convicted the Defendant of the instant crime as a single crime, and the court below maintained the first instance judgment as it is.

The ground of appeal in this part is that the court below erred in punishing the defendant as concurrent crimes, but it cannot be accepted as it resulted from the misunderstanding of the judgment below.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the grounds of appeal Nos. 2 and 3 in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, and there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of assault, contrary to what is alleged

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.