1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant B’s KRW 3,00,000, Defendant C, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. jointly with each other and each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, a publishing company established for the purpose of publishing business, published “H (hereinafter “H”)’s books “W” at around September 2015. (2) Defendant B, the representative of Defendant B, a corporation I (hereinafter “I”), is a news agency, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a reporter affiliated with Defendant D.

B. Defendant B posted Defendant B’s Pest notice, under the title of “M”, on the K’s Pest Account (L), posted the instant book, which was not released, on the 11st order of the Pester published at the Korean Publication Association, and posted the Pestbook (hereinafter “instant notice”) as indicated in attached Table 4, which includes the content of the announcement.

C. On September 27, 2015, Defendant D’s news report posted an article subject to the corrective news report indicated in attached Table 3 of Defendant C’s compilation (hereinafter “instant article”) under the title “N” on the Defendant’s website (E).

(hereinafter “the instant report”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the Plaintiff did not manipulate the order of the OMM published by the Plaintiff’s Korean Publication Board, and did not have participated in the above ranking manipulation through a shooting machine or Albagle, Defendant B did not prepare and posted the instant notice indicating the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff fabricated the order of the instant book among the above-day Ber Order; and (b) made and posted the instant notice indicating the fact that the Plaintiff used a shooting machine or mobilized comments, and (c) Defendant C, the reporter of Defendant D, without any particular grounds, cited the instant notice by the Defendant B.