beta
Text
1.At the request of an exchange change from the trial prior to remand, entry in the separate sheet of inheritance shares and deposit amounts.
Reasons
1. As to B, D, and Y, which were co-defendants of the trial court prior to the remanding of the scope of the trial in this Court, the Plaintiff received a favorable judgment in the trial court prior to the remanding of the case, and the losing party did not object to it, this part becomes all determined and excluded from the scope of the trial in this
(However, in addition, B, D, and Y became the party to the trial by taking over the defendant's net C in the trial after remanding the case, and became the party to the trial as the party to the lawsuit.
2. The facts under the recognition of facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in accordance with Gap evidence of 1 to 29, 62 to 65, and Eul evidence of 52 (including each number), together with the whole purport of the pleadings.
The plaintiff is a clan AD, a 17-year-old damage of ACJ Q, and whose members are adult men and women among descendants.
[AD was a member without any official position, but the filial behavior has been extreme, and thereafter died, the land area and CTS’s office was handed down by the CDR’s appeal of CDR 20 years of age in Joseon 4 years of age. At the same time, the Plaintiff clan had been naturally formed and actually existed since his descendants residing in the CU only in the GU of the Republic of Korea were to build CV in order to realize AD’s filial behavior, and prepared the said discussion, etc. to promote their religious services, CV’s maintenance and management, and friendship among the members of the clans since they were to promote their friendship among the members of the Plaintiff clans.]
B. The land of 1,570 square meters and AB 1,570 square meters and land of 2,539 square meters and AB 1,570 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) located in the vicinity of Gyeonggi-gun where a grave of AD was located.
The land No. 1 of this case is owned by the five co-owners of AE, AF, AH, AH, AG, and AJ on November 16, 1929, and the land No. 2 of this case is owned by five persons of AI, AF, AH, AH, AG, and AJ on November 29, 1927. The land No. 3 of this case was completed for each of four co-ownership of AE, AF, AH, and AG on April 5, 1930.
C. The above AI, AE, AF, AH, and AG are all the Plaintiff.