logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.05.30 2019나50677
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing the same as it is in accordance with the main sentence

However, with respect to the argument that the defendant emphasized or added by this court, the following judgments shall be added.

2. Additional determination

A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s project implementation plan and the project implementation change plan approved on May 18, 2011 and November 25, 201 to the Changwon City Mayor are null and void because it is obvious and significant that the important matters among the matters prescribed by the former Act and subordinate statutes are omitted, and thus, the Plaintiff’s management and disposition plan approved on October 16, 2017 from the Changwon City Mayor (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”).

(2) Article 44(5) of the Plaintiff’s articles of incorporation provides that “a person who fails to conclude a sales contract” shall be subject to cash settlement, and the Plaintiff did not notify or publicly notify the members including the Defendant of the period for sales contract.

If the defendant decides that he will not conclude a contract for sale in the future within the period of contract for sale in lots, he will be entitled to the status of the person subject to settlement in cash, and prior to that, the plaintiff's claim for delivery of the building of this case can not be allowed as unfairly compelling

B. Determination 1) Article 49 of the former Act on Urban Improvement (amended by Act No. 1457, Feb. 8, 2017) and Article 73 of the current Act provide the same contents as those of the Act (However, the current Act was added to subparagraph 3.

(1) A project implementer shall consult with the following persons on the compensation for losses of land, buildings, or other rights, within 90 days from the date following the date when a management and disposal plan is authorized or publicly announced:

Provided, That the project implementer shall commence consultation on the following date of the expiration of the period for application for parcelling-out.

arrow