The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentencing of the lower court (a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment was based on the fact that the defendant could not have led to the instant crime, and that the actual operation was not carried out.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant has been punished several times due to the violation of the Fisheries Act and the fact that there is a history of punishment as a fine and suspension of execution, and that it does not seem to be seriously against the defendant's mistake, such as the defendant's defense that he was in violation of the control and protection zone, etc., and that the defendant's name, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, method, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record relation, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's sentence imposed on the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.