Text
1.(a)
Attached Form
Among the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the list, each point indicated in the attached Form 44 through 47, 57, 58, and 44 shall be in order.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs and the defendant are deceased children of F and G, and co-inheritors.
B. The Seoul Family Court rendered a judgment on July 21, 2014 regarding the partition of co-owned property, the contributory portion 2014-Mahap90, the contributory portion 2014-Mahap97, the contributory portion, etc., as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant Claim 1”), and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, as indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant Claim 2”), based on inherited shares, divided the Plaintiffs into 13/105 shares, and the Defendant divided the real estate into 6/105 shares at the ratio of 66/105 shares, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 10, 2015.
C. The plaintiffs and the defendant did not reach an agreement on the division method of each land of this case.
[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap 6 and 7 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on this safety defense
A. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's legal representative voluntarily filed the lawsuit of this case without obtaining delegation from the plaintiffs, and that the lawsuit of this case is unlawful as a litigation act by an unauthorized representation.