logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.22 2014고정166
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 02:10 on May 6, 2013, the Defendant driven a B car free of a driver’s license, and proceeded directly to (Gu) gold-line 1 road in front of the citizen conference in the old and new Sin-si, from the 1st century community service center to (Gu) gold-line 1:00, while neglecting the duty of the front road, the Defendant shocked the front part of the victim’s D buses parked on the right side of the road due to occupational negligence, which was parked on the right side of the said car, with the front part of the said car’s right side, and continuously shocked the front part of the FF bus passenger car left side of the opposite E, which was parked on the opposite road beyond the median line.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, did not take measures necessary for preventing danger and smooth communication on the road by leaving the site even though the above FF F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F bus is destroyed to the extent that the repair cost is insufficient.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report, a actual condition survey report, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of the relevant statutes to a written estimate or a written investigation report;

1. Relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of fines (the crime committed in the form of a crime at the time of sale is not only poor, but also under trial after being prosecuted for the related cases, considering the fact that the crime was committed; however, in light of the age that the victims of the crime and the pertinent cases with which the sentence was sentenced can have been sentenced, a decision may have been rendered together with the above-related cases where the sentence was completely executed; in light of the age that the execution of the sentence could bring about the desire of the opening of the sentence

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow