Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

A person subject to registration of personal information shall attend a police agency having jurisdiction over his/her domicile every one year from the date of the initial registration and have the head of a police agency take photographs of his/her standing, front, rear, and front and rear, and store and keep them in electronic form.

On April 4, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul Central District Court on the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act on the Abuse of Occupational Authority, etc.), for eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and two years of public information, and on September 17, 2012, the Defendant first registered personal information on October 17, 2012.

Therefore, until October 17, 2013, the first registered date from October 17, 2012, the Defendant violated his duty to attend the Seoul Western Police Station having jurisdiction over the Defendant’s domicile and to respond to photographs, but did not appear within the due date.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written submission of personal information, a written notice on a person subject to registration of personal information, and a A personal information management card;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of a copy of judgment or statutes;

1. Article 5 (2) of the Addenda to the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes ( December 18, 2012), Articles 50 (3) 3 and 43 (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel's argument regarding the defense counsel's argument under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is forgotten by the defendant due to the omission of the defendant, and therefore there was no intention to violate the duty to respond to the recording by attending the police agency. However, in full view of the above evidence, the person subject to registration of personal information, who is notified of the above duty, did not appear at the police agency without justifiable grounds.