1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the plaintiffs is modified as follows. A.

The defendant is the plaintiff A.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is as stated in the part of “1. Basic Facts” of the first instance judgment, except for the case where the 4.10 main body of the first instance court’s 4.10 main body of the 4.10 main body of the 420 main body of the 1.1.1.2. The ground for the court’s explanation in this part is the same as the part of “the summary of the plaintiffs’ assertion” of the 2.1.13 main body of the 1.1.1, and thus, it shall be cited by the main body of Article 420 of the

3. Determination

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is as follows: (a) the determination on the assertion of damage to reputation and credit based on the statement of false facts (whether the liability for damages is established) is established; (b) the reasoning for the court’s explanation is that the part of “the recognition of the first instance court’s 21 to 10” is the same, except for the case where “the 7th 201. Jul. 26, 2011” was used as “the 7th 201. Jul. 26, 2012” and “the 6th 21 to 8th 8th 10”; and (b) this court’s explanation in this part is the same as the entry in the 8th 12 through 9th 8th 8th 8th 12 of the first instance court’s 8th 7th 7th 7th 2012.

2) In full view of all the circumstances revealed in the arguments in this case, the defendant's damages amount to be compensated for the plaintiff A shall be KRW 10,00,00,00, such as the following facts: the defendant's status, role, and degree of involvement in the assembly or demonstration; the period, method, and contents of the assembly or demonstration; the degree of falsity of the alleged contents; the method and degree of defamation; the anticipated ripple effect of the plaintiff's credit and image decline; and the fact that it is difficult to objectively prove the property damage incurred to the plaintiff A.