1. The Defendant: 11,685,885 won to Plaintiff A, 6,242,986 won to Plaintiff B, and 16,356,116 won to Plaintiff C, and each of these money.

1. The facts based on which Plaintiff A owned each of the subparagraphs 105, 105, 305, 305, 405, and 505, 505, 305, and 505, of the instant apartment in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and Plaintiff C, as the parties concerned do not have any dispute.

2. Determination:

A. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments as a result of the fact-finding on the records and images of Gap's 4 (including paper numbers), 5 (2017Kaman 1188) and Eul's 5 (the appraisal result of appraiser F in the case of application for preservation of evidence), and the fact-finding on the E apartment management office, water leakage occurred at a wall installed inside the wall between the main bank and balcony 505-2 and the apartment of this case, through concrete of the floor of 505-205-205-105-105-105-105-105-205-205-205-205-205-205-205-205-200-200-200-200-200-300-30-30-30,000-14,00-14,00-14,017).

Thus, the water leakages of the apartment Nos. 105, 305 and 405 of this case occurred due to defects in the pipes of 505 of this case, and the defendant is the owner of the apartment of this case who is the owner of 505 of this case and has a duty to manage the apartment of this case so as not to cause damage to the residents of the next floor due to water leakage, etc., and therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the above defects.

B. According to the evidence revealed earlier, the scope of damages is required to repair each apartment of this case caused by the foregoing defect.