A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2003, the Defendant opened the Industrial Bank of Korea's U.S. P. P. and a political account and traded household checks.

On July 10, 2012, the Defendant issued a one copy of the household check in the name of the Defendant, which became the date of issuance on November 3, 2012, at the “D” office operated by the Defendant in the Hahbuk-gun C, E, face value of KRW 5,00,000, and the date of issuance.

On November 5, 2012, the holder of the check at issue presented the check to the above bank on November 5, 2012, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment, but the defendant did not pay the check due to the shortage of deposit

In addition, from July 10, 2012 to October 9, 2012, the Defendant issued 9 copies of household checks in the name of the Defendant, 45,000,000 won in total, and presented payment proposal within the payment period respectively between the check holder and the check holder, as shown in attached Table 1.

On March 31, 2003, the Defendant opened the Industrial Bank of Korea's U.S. branch and the current account and traded household checks.

On September 19, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number F, face value of 5,00,000, and one copy of the household check under the name of the Defendant, which was issued on December 22, 2012, at the “D” office operated by the Defendant in the Hahbuk-gun C.

On December 7, 2012, the holder of the check at issue presented the above check to the above bank on December 7, 2012, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment, but the defendant did not pay it as non-transaction.

By October 16, 2012, the Defendant issued 3 copies of household checks in the name of the Defendant, 15,000,000 won in total, on three occasions as indicated in attached Table 2, and presented the check to the bearer within the time limit for payment respectively, but the check bearer failed to receive the payment as suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

"2012 Highest 1641"

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.