1. On April 12, 2018, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 10, 2014, the Plaintiff joined B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant place of business”) and worked as the head of the logistics and event team. On November 19, 2015, the Plaintiff discovered the Plaintiff’s club fee that the Plaintiff did not work at the Plaintiff’s home, and subsequently, discovered the Plaintiff’s club fee that was written to the Plaintiff’s home, and thereafter, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant upon diagnosis of the right-hand cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism (hereinafter “instant injury”).

B. On April 12, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the application for medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) in accordance with the determination of the Occupational Disease Determination Committee, where proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work and the injury and disease of the instant case is not recognized (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff had accumulated physical or mental illness by performing excessive duties while working in the workplace of this case. The defendant's disposition of this case on different premise is unlawful, even though the injury of this case was caused by the occupational overwork and stress, or the high blood pressure of the plaintiff's existing disease of this case aggravated due to the natural progress or above, which led to the injury of this case.

B. Fact-finding 1) Plaintiff’s work details and work hours - The Plaintiff joined the instant workplace on November 10, 2014, and was in charge of preparation for the opening of the Cmate, and was in charge of the event planning, warehouse logistics management, cultural center management, and civil petition management, etc. From January 20, 2015, the Plaintiff was in charge of the operation planning, warehouse logistics management, and the head of the team for logistics and events as the head of the event team. - The Plaintiff was in charge of six days a week’s work (the working hours selected on Saturdays or Sundays were from 09:0 to 18:00, the rest hours were from 12:00 to 13:00, and the rest hours were 14:0 to 23:00 a week.

-.