All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment), the defendant asserts that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant again committed a crime even before and after having been sentenced to the same punishment, which is highly dangerous in light of the method of the crime, and that the thief was not restored even if the total amount of thief was exceeded KRW 10 million, it is inevitable to punish the Defendant with severe punishment.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant appears to reflect on the defendant's attitude, and the overall conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for the crime, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem to be too heavy or unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.