1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 13, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as an injury or disease of “self-explosion, luminous promotion,” during the process of spreading the first chemical in the Yacheon City’s Yacheon-si’s Yacheon-si’s Yacheon-si’s Yacheon-si, with high temperature in face and arms (hereinafter “instant injury or disease with the approval of the first medical care for the injury or disease with the approval of the instant injury or disease, and was provided medical care from August 19, 2016 to September 19, 2016.

B. After that, on May 29, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) caused an injury or disease in the “other fears, and any other toxical contact infection caused by the unknown cause” (hereinafter “the instant application’s injury”); and (b) filed an application for additional medical care for the injury or disease; and (c) filed an application for additional medical care.

C. On June 19, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to not approve the Plaintiff’s application for additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) according to the Defendant’s medical opinion, that “The Plaintiff was treated for one month with a certificate of knowledge and contact infection, and there is continuous medical treatment if the skin is infected by the first medication, and generally, it is deemed that there is no correlation with the first system, and that the treatment was performed on December 2016.”

Although the plaintiff filed a request for examination against this, the request for examination was dismissed on August 17, 2017.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the injury and disease of this case occurred due to the recurrence or aggravation of the injury and disease of this case’s previous approval, and there is a proximate causal relation with the injury and disease of this case’s previous approval. Thus, the Defendant’s disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

B. Medical opinion on the injury and disease of the instant application 1) Plaintiff’s doctor’s (A) May 27, 2017: the expected period of treatment for the outpatient hospital: From September 19, 2016.