Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 28, 2018, from around 21:50 to 22:20 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main operation duties by force by force, such as: (a) from around December 28, 2018 to around 22:50 of the same day, the Defendant did not sell alcoholic beverages on the ground that the Defendant had already taken it; (b) on the ground that the Defendant had already taken it, he did not sell alcoholic beverages; and (c) on the ground that the Defendant had already taken it on the floor of the said main shop, the Defendant left the said main shop.
2. On December 28, 2018, around 22:30 on December 28, 2018, the Defendant, at the entrance of the main place as indicated in paragraph (1), took a 112-report to the effect that business obstruction was inflicted, and the circumstances leading to the position of the E-district of the Busan M&M station, which was called out, prevented the Defendant from re-entering into the said main place, and assaulted F, such as “I am, I am to the police, I am to the police, and I am to the front place.”
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of each police statement related to C and F;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report, an investigation report (on-site CCTV image verification), an investigation report (Attachment of dynamic images attached to the obstruction of performance of official duties), and an investigation report (the closure of the images of the obstruction
1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The crime that interferes with the execution of official duties by a police officer on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment even in order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the light of the public authority.
However, it is the fact that the police officer stated in Paragraph 2 of the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the defendant agreed with the victim as stated in Paragraph 1 of the criminal facts.