The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of each of the instant crimes, and the Defendant’s commission of each of the instant crimes since 11 years after being punished for a drug-related crime.

However, the Defendant was sentenced one time to a suspended sentence, three times as a fine, and five times as a fine, and was sentenced to a punishment for narcotics-related crimes, and the Defendant was arrested under a warrant of arrest on July 10, 2015 and was released after being investigated by an investigative agency, and the warrant of arrest was issued and detained again. On August 21, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime on the ground that it was committed during the above period, and there was no change in the nature of the crime; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and consequence of the crime; and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, such as the record and arguments after the crime, are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.