logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.08.20 2019고정189
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동퇴거불응)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 4, 2019, the judgment became final and conclusive on November 20, 2019 after having been sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with labor for violating the Railroad Safety Act in the Netcheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court.

Defendant

B was prosecuted on December 31, 2018 and tried to reach an agreement with the Defendant A, E, by using violence to the wife C (ma, 61 years of age) of the victim C (ma, 57 years of age).

On January 18, 2019, the Defendants and E discovered the victim’s home in front of the victim’s home located in the Yongnam-gun F, 15:25 on January 18, 2019, and were expressed to the effect that Defendant A was able to look at the victim’s home, enter the gate into the gate, and then “Ba” was expressed to the effect that the victim was able to enter the gate over several occasions.

Nevertheless, the Defendants and E stayed in the above house without going out of the above gate, and Defendant A she saw the victim’s sound from the above house to be fluored with the victim’s door, and fluored with the victim into the house, and she saw the victim into the house, and she saw the victim into the house, and she saw the victim as “s, money, s, and so on.” After the math, the fluord with the victim, while continuing to hold the fluor, Defendant B she saw the fluor at the above house, and she fluordddd with the victim, and she fluorddd with the victim during the period of the fluoring the fluor as above, while Defendant A she fluordddddd with the fluor, and she fluordd with the fluor, while the Defendants fluding the fluor in the above house.

As a result, Defendants and E jointly leave from the victim

Even after receiving the Gu, the Gu did not comply with it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (including two CDs attached to a copy of CCTV submitted by a victim);

1. Investigative Report, the submission of the victim ctv video.

arrow