A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2013, at the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “a person is on the roadside” was received 112 reports; and (b) expressed that he was able to be urged to return home from a police officer affiliated with F, such as a slope E belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station D District Unit of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, which called “F,” and expressed that he was f to f, “the head of the frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib fri frib fri frib fri fib fib fib fib fib fri

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., de facto reflecting the fact that the suspension of execution is de facto and there is no past record of punishment exceeding the fine);