beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the representative director of the E-A-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U.
1. A defendant in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) against the victim E received 30 million won from the J on May 14, 2009 from the said I real estate representative to the bank account in the name of the victim E (K). The above 30 million won was collected in full on the same day and voluntarily consumed 10 million won for the personal use of the defendant, and the attached Table from around that time to June 15, 201
1. A total of KRW 1,263,017,043 of the funds owned by the victim who had been in business custody over a total of 281 times, such as the statement in the list of crimes (EF embezzlement) was embezzled voluntarily by the Defendant’s personal use.
2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) against the victim F was arbitrarily remitted KRW 12,577,40 from the new bank account (M) in the name of the victim F to the national bank account (O) account in the name of the victim F in the name of the U.S. travel expenses to the vice head of G Asset Management Team L families, which was known to the general public around July 22, 2010, and attached Forms from around that time to July 1
2. As indicated in the list of crimes (FF embezzlement), 1,14,291,93 won was arbitrarily consumed and embezzled for personal use by the Defendant.
3. The Defendant violated the Employment Insurance Act, upon completing a master’s degree course at Puniversity’s conference, entered false students in the above school as if they were E and F’s employees, and paid scholarships to the company’s funds. As such, the Defendant conspired with the above school students.