1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On May 1, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status recognition to the Defendant on July 27, 2012, while entering the Republic of Korea for a short-term visit visa (C-3 and 90 days of stay) on May 1, 2012.

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition to deny the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on May 15, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on April 2, 2015.

【The Plaintiff’s assertion of legitimacy of the instant disposition as to the instant evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), 1 and 2 was the Plaintiff’s assertion of legitimacy of the instant disposition. The Plaintiff’s assertion was the Plaintiff’s assertion of legitimacy of the instant disposition, which is the Plaintiff’s business partner, as the Plaintiff’s business partner, entered the Republic of Korea around May 1, 2012 with the Plaintiff’s business partner (Bali) and died at the heart.

Since then, if the family members and patriarchs return to the Plaintiff, they threatened the Plaintiff to kill the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s mother was killed by the patriarche.

As such, the Defendant’s disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though there is a high possibility that the Plaintiff would suffer from gambling when the Plaintiff returned to Kamera.

Judgment

If the above facts are added to the contents of evidence Nos. 3 and 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings, it is insufficient to view that the plaintiff has a well-founded fear of persecution to the plaintiff, taking into account the following circumstances, and there is no evidence to prove otherwise, the defendant's disposition of this case is legitimate.

The result of the autopsy revealed that the private person B was a simple heart with B's family members.