The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, by force, was guilty of all of the facts charged of this case, although he did not interfere with the preparation of documents by the victim, client counseling services, or did not comply with the victim's request for withdrawal. The judgment of the court below is erroneous by misconception

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant requested the victim, who is the secretary general, at the D's law office from September 30, 2014 to 15:36 of the same day, to change the record of the Defendant's divorce lawsuit at the D's law office, which was the head of the secretariat, but was subject to rejection.

A. Dr. Dr. R. L.C.

Libera Does Libera Doese Doese Libera Doese

In the case of a disturbance, such as "a tag", the victim requests the defendant to leave the office on seven occasions.

Even if requested, the defendant continued to stay in the front corridor of the entrance or exit of the office and failed to comply with such request. The defendant's act can be acknowledged that the victim cannot properly consult with the client who was in the process of preparing the litigation documents and counseling. If the facts are the same, the defendant's act may interfere with the preparation of the litigation documents and the client's consultation by force, and sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant did not comply with the victim's request for eviction.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.