1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 19, 2006, the Mayor of the Seoul Metropolitan Government designated the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Il-dae, 1,851,020 square meters as an urban renewal acceleration district, and on April 3, 2008, the Mayor of the Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced as E in Seoul, publicly announced on April 3, 2008, publicly announced the renewal acceleration plan that is designated as the renewal acceleration district under Article 13(1)1 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Urban Renewal (if the designation is made as an urban renewal acceleration district, it shall be deemed that the designation is made as a rearrangement district under Article 13(1)1 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Urban Renewal; hereinafter

B. The B Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “Promotion Committee”) established the instant rearrangement zone as an expected project implementation area, and obtained approval for establishment from the Defendant on May 6, 2008, and held an inaugural general meeting of the partnership on February 17, 2009, and applied for authorization for establishment of the association to the Defendant.

(hereinafter “instant application”). At the time of the instant application, the instant promotion committee submitted the name list stating five names, such as G et al., and H, I, I, J, K, and L, among the 680 owners of land, etc. in the instant improvement zone, the name of 24 owners of land, etc. in the instant improvement zone, including G et al.

C. On March 20, 2009, the Defendant approved the establishment of the Intervenor’s Intervenor Union (hereinafter “ Intervenor Union”) on the ground that 498 of the 650 owners of the land, etc. in the instant rearrangement zone, excluding 21 persons whose whereabouts are unknown among 680 owners of land, etc., and 650 persons except 9 dead, met the consent rate of 76.61% under the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 10268, Apr. 15, 2010; hereinafter “former Act”).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The seven owners of land, etc. in the instant rearrangement zone, including M, shall file a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the instant disposition with the Seoul Administrative Court 2009Guhap56020 on December 23, 2009 (hereinafter “instant previous lawsuit”).