beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for four months, for four months, and for six months, for six months.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
E is a person who forges and supplies a tenant recruitment, interest, certificate of employment, etc. under a false lease contract, and Defendant A is a broker who operates a G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F, and is the lessor of Gyeyang-gu 201 mobile to the H building in Incheon Gyeyang-gu and I, 101, and Defendant B, J, and Defendant C is the lessee of a false lease contract.
Although the Defendants and J did not have a de facto lease relationship with E, the real estate brokerage office prepared a false lease contract as if the nominal owner entered into a contract to move into the house owned by the leased nominal owner as a whole, and submitted false certificate of employment and false income evidentiary documents to the financial institution as if he received regular wages while working in the workplace, and made public subscriptions to deceiving financial institutions by applying for loans to obtain loans from the National Housing Fund, and to acquire the “workers and ordinary people’s house rental fund” financed by the
1. On August 18, 2010, Defendant B and Defendant A’s co-principal Defendants drafted the G Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office operated by Defendant A in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and Defendant B drafted a false lease contract with K as the broker of Defendant A (a lessee: B, lessor: K, Incheon Gyeyang-gu L Building 201; 70,000,000, and period from August 27, 2010).
Since then, Defendant B made a false certificate of employment and a certificate of income tax withholding to Defendant B, and Defendant B filed an application for a loan of KRW 49,000,000 for a loan with a false certificate of employment and a certificate of income tax withholding, and a pre-paid contract attached to the pre-paid 211-5, Gyeyang-dong, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon. Around the 26th day of the same month, Defendant B received KRW 49,00,000 from the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the victim on the same day.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E.