beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant K 2,618,396 won and its related amount shall be 5% per annum from November 21, 2014 to April 28, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendants granted a loan to the Defendants who misrepresented to be a financial company employee on or around November 25, 2013 or on the 26th of the same month, and issued the account passbook, cash card, password, etc. under the Defendants’ name to the above bearers.
B. On November 25, 2013, the Plaintiff heard the phrase “to convert an existing loan into a low interest rate. To make a substitute loan, the Plaintiff would have to obtain a single loan from the lending company,” and, accordingly, notified his/her nameless person of his/her Internet banking information to provide him/her with his/her Internet banking information through Internet banking from November 26, 2013 through Internet banking from the lending account in the Plaintiff’s name to November 29, 2013, and transferred the money as indicated in the Defendant’s “transfer amount” column in the Defendant’s Schedule.
(hereinafter “this case’s Bosing crime”). (c)
Plaintiff
The money transferred from the account in the name of the Defendants to the account in the name of the Defendants was immediately or immediately withdrawn from the next day after the transfer through the name influence box, and among which, 2,618,396 won remain as of the date of closing the argument in the account in the Defendant KF Bank.
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2-1 through 15, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1 and 4, Eul evidence No. 1 through No. 4, the purport of this court's order of submission of each financial transaction information to Korea Post, Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd., Cheongju Livestock Industry Cooperatives, New Agricultural Cooperatives, Shinhae Agricultural Cooperatives, and Large-month Agricultural Cooperatives,
2. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff transferred money as stated in the "transfer amount" column by the defendant as stated in the attached Table by the defendant to the account in the name of the defendants, because it belongs to the crime of Bophishing of the plaintiff's name in this case. The plaintiff delivered the passbook, cash card, and password in the name of the defendants to the non-indicted of the name as to the amount between the non-indicted of name and the withdrawal from the above account.