A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Ck3 motor vehicles.

On April 2, 2015, the Defendant driving the said car on April 2, 2015, along the two lanes in the direction of the Chuncheon long distance from the direction of the ‘E Hospital' ahead of the 'E Hospital' located in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-si.

With the first line, a straight line has been changed to a straight line.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view by the vehicle on the crosswalks around the crosswalks at night, and it was difficult to secure the view by the vehicle on the front, so there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by safely driving the vehicle by safely driving it, such as reducing speed, changing the course of the vehicle, accurately manipulating the steering and brakes, etc.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant got out from the right side of the Gansung Hospital the victim F (30 years old, South) who illegally crossed the vicinity of the crosswalk on the right side of the pedestrian crossing signal from the side of the Gansung Hospital to the front part of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, around April 2, 2015, around 03:14, the Defendant caused the victim’s death by occupational negligence, from a astronomical mother hospital of the Katol University, which was 327, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.

around May 19, 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the business employees belonging to Hyundai Capital of the injured party and the JJ equivalent to KRW 75 million in the market price at the I office operated by the Defendant’s father H in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, to pay rent of KRW 1,627,500 per month from June 30, 2014 to 48 months from June 30, 2014, and received the said AD vehicle after concluding the lease agreement to return the vehicle.

While the Defendant was in custody of the said AD vehicle for the victim, the Defendant was in arrears with the lease fee after November 30, 2014 and received the notification of the return of the vehicle from the victim.