1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:05 on July 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a C-string motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.186% while under the influence of alcohol content, from the front side of the opening site in the Dong-dong, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul to the front side of the same Eup/Myeon, and from around 1km to the road in front of the same Eup/Myeon-dong, the Defendant driven a C-string motor vehicle.

2. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant also aided and abetting the offender by using the Defendant’s mobile phone in an influence area around Daejeon (Seoul) and, even though the Defendant did not drive under the influence of alcohol as above, directly driven the said agreement vehicle to the investigation agency even though he did not do so.

It provided detailed information on the date, time, place, details of learning of tea, etc. to the kynad's mind to make statements.

Accordingly, D knew that the Defendant was driving a drinking, and, on July 12, 2016, around 10:00, he/she prepared a false statement to the effect that the Defendant was able to escape from the offender by submitting a false statement to the Seoul Young-gun Police Station’s life safety and transportation at the center of Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the slopeF belonging to the above police station around 03:05, while drinking alcohol, and by submitting a false statement to the effect that he/she was able to escape from the offender by stating that he/she was able to directly drive a Cheongdong-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City under the influence of alcohol at around 211.

Accordingly, the defendant could make it easy for D to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Two-time suspect interrogation records against H and I, respectively;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of a driver driving a drinking alcohol, notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol, investigation report (in accordance with the delay of measurement), investigation report (the specific circumstances of the driver of the vehicle suspected of driving alcohol), investigation report (the verification of the authenticity of

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 of the same Act concerning the crime;