logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.11.13 2014고단969
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 6. 28. 8:10경 거제시 거제대로 3370 대우조선해양 내 H암벽 인근에 있는 "C" 선박 안에서 다른 사람과 전화통화를 하는 척하며 피해자 D(21세)에게 "빨갱이, 저놈이 내 정기를 빨아 먹는다, 내 기운을 뺏어간다. 뭘 봐 이 씨발 놈아, 눈깔 파버린다."라고 욕을 하고, 이에 피해자가 피고인의 전화기를 보기 위해 피고인의 손을 잡아당기자, 피해자에게 욕을 하며 왼손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고, 오른손으로 피해자의 뺨을 1회 때리고, 위험한 물건인 랜턴(길이 17cm)으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 여러 차례 내리찍어 피해자에게 약 3주간의 치료가 필요한 비골 골절 등의 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and diagnostic instruments;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Consideration of favorable circumstances among the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of recommended sentencing criteria - Basic area (two years to four years) of the type of special injury; and

2. In comprehensive consideration of all the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and consequence of the crime (the fact that the injury is not serious), circumstances after the crime (the fact that the victim has deposited KRW 2 million for the victim although it is not agreed with the victim), and criminal records (the fact that there is no criminal conviction or heavier than a suspended sentence) and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of the case, the sentence is determined as per the order beyond the scope

arrow