The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not catch and depict the victim’s bat at the time of the instant case.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the lower court, the Defendant sufficiently recognized the fact that he she dumpeddddddd and boomed the victim on September 17, 2016 and boomed around 17:00.

A. A. Around September 2016, the victim was operating a DNA certified broker office located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, and the defendant was operating the office immediately next to the above office.

B. On September 7, 2016, around 17:00 on September 7, 2016, the victim complained of the defendant who he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she, and brought about the person and petroleum in his/her place of business.

The defendant has caused a dispute with the victim in the course of putting the above proposer and the petroleum fluor.

(c)

The victim brought a petition against the defendant on September 9, 2016 that he/she had the victim's chest and face.

After making a statement in the investigative agency or the court of the court below, the defendant made a statement to the effect that the defendant continued to keep the victim's chest and face together or flabed.

(d)

G at the time of the instant case in the court of the court below, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant told himself as the victim’s flab, and the victim’s spathical diameter was left from the floor, and the victim was flabed, and he was the victim’s face.

was stated.

G's statement is not only concrete but also reliable in accordance with the situation at the time, and it is difficult for G to find any particular reason for G to make a false testimony for the victim.

E. Although H stated in the court below that at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not look at the victim’s breath. However, the Defendant F, who was engaged in the search and investigation for nearby merchants in the instant field after the instant case, did not look at the victim’s breath.