1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, J, K, and L are children of M and N, the first deniedr, and the O, Defendant E, P, G, Defendant H, and I are children of Q, the second deniedr.

B. Q completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on July 10, 1972, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet of real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in the Plaintiff’s name as a father-in-child on March 8, 1973, as to each real estate indicated in the separate sheet of real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

C. On March 11, 1994, Q drafted a letter stating the following contents to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant letter”).

The fourth parcel of the instant real estate in fact is owned by A (Plaintiff) by sole management, or the registration of ownership transfer was made under the name of Qu for the convenience of cutting off Soraf Black Y Paris diving-prevention felling as of July 10, 1942. As such, A does not have to do any juristic act without A’s consent, such as the transfer and the lease of security, and in the event of a violation, he/she will accept any disadvantage.

On the other hand, inheritance relations concerning the real estate of this case are as follows.

(Attachment 1) As Q dies on April 1, 200, Q’s rights and obligations with respect to the instant real estate shall have 3/15 shares to Q, its husband M, and the heir of P, who died on April 12, 1989, shall be the husband M, and the heir of P, who died on April 12, 1989.

(2) Since the death of M on December 10, 207, the shares of M in respect of the instant real estate (3/15) were inherited in proportion to the shares of the Plaintiff,O, Defendant E, F (P’s substitute heir), G, H, I, J, K, and L, each of which was 3/150 (=3/15 x 1/100).

3) Meanwhile, as theO died on July 22, 2008, the portion of inheritance (23/150 = 20/150 = 20/150 = 3/150 = 23/150 x 3/7) shares of theO to B, who are the wife of theO, and the shares of 46/1050 = 23/1050 + 23/150 x 2/150 x 2/7) shares were inherited respectively to C and D, who are the children. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each of the entries (including a provisional number, and the entire pleadings) in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8.