logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.12 2018노2590
아동복지법위반(아동에대한음행강요ㆍ매개ㆍ성희롱등)등
Text

The judgment below

The guilty portion shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall be 40 hours.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, or incomplete hearing does not have any fact that the Defendant committed the crimes as indicated in the judgment of the court below. The date and time of each crime listed in subparagraph 1-B of the crime indicated in the judgment of the court below did not appear at the home of the Defendant at the time of the crime indicated in subparagraph 1-B of the crime indicated in the judgment of the court below. Since the date of the crime stated in subparagraph 2-b of the crime stated in the judgment of the court below did not appear at the home of the Defendant after returning home to the new wall, there is no credibility of the victim’s statement that he/she committed the crime after he/she goes home at 20:00. The victim’s statement is without consistency, and it is doubtful that the victim did not state his/her opinion according to the investigator’s cancer or inducement, and that it appears that the victim did not have any mental disorder such as the victim’s ordinary words, and that it does not constitute an indecent act or intimidation by force by force by the Defendant without being misunderstanding or threat of the victim’s.

3) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable. B. Prosecutor 1) the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, the victim’s age, and the statement.

arrow